Demographic and Socio-economic Consequences of Child Labour in Anambra State, Nigeria.

ABSTRACT  

 labour participation is , contrary to the of the Child, and threatens child development, the , State and the nation at large. This study assesses the demographic and socio-economic consequences of child labour in Anambra State, Nigeria. The objectives were to examine the type of work engaged in by the children, determine the factors responsible for child labour practices, identify the condition of work, assess the demographic and socio-economic consequences of child labour and lastly ascertain the specific possible impact of child labour on the future workforce in the state.

A purposive sampling technique was used to select the sampled areas in the study area as well as the respondents. A total of 400 children aged between 04-17 years, who are involved in laborious activities were administered a structured questionnaire to collect data. In addition, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was also conducted to gather information from child labourers employers. The data was analysed using computer SPSS software 19 version. The results are presented using tables and chats. The results indicated that 53.0% of the child labourers are males, child labour participation is found to be higher among older children aged 11-17 years than those aged 4-10.

More than half of child labourers are from the size of a large household of 5-9 persons. Out of the entire child labourers, 42.5% are indigenes of Anambra State and 35.0% from Ebonyi State, while the remaining hairs are from the other surrounding States. The educational status of child labourers shows that 56.5% are in school, while 43.5% are out of school, public school children are the most affected as 77.0% are in public schools, with 66.0% in primary school levels. Out of the entire sampled respondent, 174 (43.5%) are out of school, out of which 95.4% dropped out from school, while 4.6% have never been to school before.

The poverty of parents accounted for the major reasons for child‟s school dropouts. About 73.5% of the child labourers work between 4-6 days a week. Most of the children (71.8%) spend more than 7 hours at work. On the working condition of the respondents, the study found that 50.0% of the child labourers work on a temporal basis and the remaining work on either contract or permanent basis, 72.5% starts work at the age between 4-10 years, the highest earned monthly income by the children is between ₦2001-₦2500, 64.5% eats twice daily. 

INTRODUCTION  

According to the Child Right’s Act 2003, passed into law in the Federal Capital Territory Abuja, a child is a person who has not attained the age of eighteen years. On the other hand, labour according to the Macmillan dictionary connotes the aggregate of all human physical and mental effort used in the creation of goods and services. Put together, the concept of Child Labour has probably been in existence almost as long as the history of mankind and connotes all economic activities carried out by children regardless of their occupational status (Oloko, 1997).

It includes both works that are permissible under the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) conventions and those that which is not (International Labour Organization-International Programme for the Elimination of Child Labour) (ILO-IPEC, 2002). According to United Nation Children Emergency Fund (UNICEF) (2007), Child labour is essentially understood as encompassing monetary or non-monetary activities which are mentally or physically, morally or socially hazardous for children below 15 years.

Across countries and societies, various forms of child labour exist these forms range from trafficking, commercial sexual exploitation, child domestic labour and illicit activities. Other forms include street hawking, waste pickers, company labourers, apprentices, babysitting, barrow pushers and commercial drivers/ conductors/ touts, water vendors, farmworkers, housemaids, gardeners, cleaners, and other artisans. Some of which are done on a contract basis, whereas, some are considered as free services to guardians or relatives who in return payback in cash or kind to the child or the child‟s parent all of which are hazardous to the child overall development (Oloko, 1997). 

REFERENCES

Abumere, S.I, Okafor S.I and Oluwasola O. (2002). Rural Infrastructure and Development Process
in Rural Nigeria. Research report, No. 36. Development Policy Centre, Ibadan.
Adeoye, S. (2007). Needed! A State of Emergency TELL. May 21, pp. 25- 27.
Aderinto, A.A. (2000). Social correlates and coping measures of street children: A comparative
study of street and non-street children in Southwestern Nigeria. Child Abuse & Neglect,
24(9): 1199-213.
Adewuyi, S.A. (1998). Socio-cultural Determinants of Street begging in Northern Nigeria: The
Case of Sokoto. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis Submitted to the Department of Sociology
University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Adudu, F. (1987). Urban Poverty and Labour Abuse in Benin City. Benin: Evens Brother
Publisher
Agiobu-Kemmer, I.S. (1992). Child survival and child development in Africa. Bernard van Leer
Foundation Studies and Evaluation Papers No. 6. The Hague.
Ahmed, I. (1999). Getting rid of child labour” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 34, no. 27,
pp. 1815-1822.
Ahmed, M.A. (1991). Child Labour in Pakistan: A Study of the Lahore Area. Child Welfare
70(2): 261-267.
Alam, S., Mondal, N.I. and Rahmanm M. (2008). Child Labour Due to Poverty: A study on
Dinajpur District, Bangladesh. The Social Sciences journal 3(5) 388-391.
Ali, M., S. Shahab, H. Ushijima T. and Muynck A. (2004). Street children in Pakistan: A
situational analysis of social conditions and nutritional status. Social Science & Medicine,
59: 1707-17.
Amin, A.A. (1994). The Socio-Economic Impact of Child Labour in Cameroon. LABOUR
Capital and Society 27(2): 234-248.
Amuda, Y.J. (2010). Working Conditions and Consequences of Child Labour in Nigeria. OIDA
Int’l Journal of sustainable development vol. 0:07(53-72).

StudentsandScholarship Team.

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *