Monetary Policy and Price Stability in Nigeria (December, 2006 Through February, 2012).

ABSTRACT

This research work evaluates the responses of inflation, interest and  exchange rate to  shocks in Monetary Policy (captured by MPR) as well as the impacts of MPR  on  these Macroeconomic Variables.

The study used monthly data spanning from December,  2006  (when the MPR was introduced) through February, 2012.  Following  Joao  and  Andrea (2006), the research used Structural VAR to estimate the model.

The result  shows  that  inflation responds to shocks in MPR only in a fairly unstable manner (a pattern that is almost unpredictable); in the first four periods, positive shocks in MPR could  not  bring  down inflation but thereafter, any further increase in MPR produced gradually  declining  but  positive rate of interest.

On the other hand, exchange rate responds to shocks in MPR in a relatively downward fashion and quickly assumes upward trend from the  second  period  lasting throughout the period, while interest rate, responds quickly and positively to shocks in MPR from the first thorough the last period.

Therefore, interest and exchange rates are more responsive to shocks in MPR  than inflation and above all sometimes changes in MPR cannot guarantee the expected changes in Inflation (because of large informal sector as well as policy divergence between the monetary  and  fiscal authorities among other reasons).

Hence, of all the three variables, inflation is the most difficult to deal with and stability of which is a necessary condition for the achievement of stability in the other two variables (interest & exchange rates).

More  so,  interest  and exchange rates as well as MPC meetings are better predictors of MPR (because of their high sensitivity to it) than the rate of inflation.

The result also uncovered that as the most difficult enemy of the economy, inflation cannot be effectively and efficiently conquered with the variation in MPR alone, other instruments particularly  Cash  Reserve  Requirement  (CRR) and especially Open Market Operations (OMO) should be prudently used to compliment the efficacy of MPR.

Consequently, the paper further recommends  the  current  monetary tightening stance of CBN but should be used with caution, improvement and expansion of the cash-lite policy and non-interest banking of the CBN, infrastructural development, harmonization of fiscal and monetary policy as well as the reduction in the number of MPC meetings to at most quarterly unless in case of emergency.

TABLE OF CONTENT 

  • Background of the Study…. 1
  • Problem Statement………… 2
  • Research Questions………. 4
  • Objectives of the Study……. 4
  • Justification of the Study……. 5
  • Hypothesis………………. 6
  • Scope………… 7
  • Limitations of Study……… 7
  • Literature Review……… 9
  • Conceptual Literature…… 9
    • Overview of Inflation………….. 9
    • Monetary Policy and Inflation in Nigeria….. 14
    • Overview of Exchange Rate…………. 15
    • Exchange Rate Management in Nigeria…… 16
    • Problem with the Nigerian Exchange Rate System……….. 17
    • Inflation and Exchange Rate…….. 19
    • Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate….. 19
    • Overview of Interest Rate…… 20
    • Interest Rate Management……….. 21
    • Interest Rate Management Techniques…… 22
    • Interest and Exchange Rates……….. 22
    • Interest and Inflation……. 23
    • Monetary Policy and Interest Rate……………. 24
    • Inflation, Interest and Exchange rate (Macroeconomic) Stability….. 24
    • Definition of very important Terminologies (VIT)…… 26
    • Theoretical Literature……. 29
    • The Monetarist Theory………. 29
    • Keynesian Liquidity Theory of Interest…. 30
    • Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) Theory……… 33
    • Interest Rate Parity Theory……. 34

2.6.0    Empirical Literature………. 34

3.1.0     Methodology; introduction………. 38

3.2.0     Sources of Data…… 38

3.3.0     Model Specification…. 38

  • Estimation Techniques……. 39
  • Unit Root Test……….. 39
  • Granger Causality Test…………. 40
  • Impulse Response Function……. 40
  • Variance Decomposition……………. 41
  1. 0.0 Analysis of the Result……….. 42

4.1.0     Unit Root Test…… 42

4.2.0     Granger Causality Test………. 42

4.3.0    Impulse Response Function…. 44

4.4.0    Variance Decomposition………. 49

5.0.0   Summary, Conclusion and Recommendations……. 51

5.1.0   Summary……… 51

5.2.0   Outline of Findings.. 51

5.3.0   Conclusion………… 52

5.4.0   Recommendation……. 52

5.5.0    Future Directions of Research……… 54

Reference        55

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

Economic literatures vindicated that price stability could be achieved through  monetary or fiscal policy or an appropriate combinations of the two (CBN, 2012; Idowu, 2010).

Fiscal policy is a policy under which the Government uses its expenditure and  revenue programmes  to produce desirable effects and avoid undesirable effects on the national income, production and employment.

The Monetary policy on the other hand  refers  to the  specific actions  taken by the Central Bank to regulate the value, supply and cost of money in the economy with a  view to achieving Government’s macroeconomic objectives  (CBN,  2012).

For  many countries like Nigeria, these objectives are explicitly stated in the  laws  establishing  the  central bank, while for others they are not. In Nigeria, the  major  objectives  of  monetary policy are the attainment of price stability and sustainable economic growth (Sanusi, 2012).

Associated objectives are those of full employment, stable long-term interest rates and real exchange rates. In pursuing these objectives, the CBN recognises the existence of conflicts among the objectives necessitating at some points some sort of trade-offs  (Uchendu, 2010).

REFERENCES

Adamson, Y. K. (2002), “Structure Disequilibrium and inflation in Nigeria; A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis”. Centre for Economic Research on Africa. New Jessy 07043; Montclair state University, upper Montclair.

Alesina, A. and Summers, L. H. (1993), “Central Bank Independence and Macroeconomic Performance: Some comparative evidence”, journal of Money, Credit and Banking, volume 25, number 2, may.

Amato, J. D. and Gerlach, S. (2002), “Inflation Targeting in Emerging Transition Economies; Lesson after a Decade”. European Economic Review, 46; 781-790.

Anguyo, F. L. (2008), “Exchange Rate Pass-through to Inflation in Uganda: Evidence from a Vector Error Correction Model”; Working Paper (BOUWP/09/08), Research Department Bank of Uganda.

Azam, J. (20010), “Inflation and Macroeconomic Instability in Madagascar”.

African Development Review, number 132, December, 175-201.

Berg, A. and Pattillo, C. (1999), “Are currency crises predictable? A Test”. IMF Staff papers, 46; 107.

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *