A Comparative Analysis of Legislative Process and Democratic Governance in Nigeria and United States, 1999-2014.
ABSTRACT
This study engaged in a comparative analysis of legislative process and democratic governance in Nigeria and United States. The difference in legislative process between Nigeria and United States which accounts for varying democratic governance in both countries necessitated this study.
In order to achieve this onerous task, the research work was guided by the following research questions: does the process of legislation in Nigeria and United States explain the feasibility of democratic governance in these two countries?
What are the factors that militates legislative institutions from promoting democratic governance in Nigeria and United States? Methodologically, the research adopted the Structural-Functional Analysis as the theory that best suits the study as well as the Ex-Post Facto research design.
The research relied on the secondary sources of data and descriptive method of data analysis. The study revealed that the existence of legislature does not necessarily promote democratic governance.
The United States Congress has an efficient committee system that reinforces public confidence and trust in the United States legislative process through robust check on the executive excesses and abuses, which is the hallmark of their democratic governance.
This is not fully obtainable in Nigeria’s National Assembly and its democratic practice. The factors in the National Assembly which militates democratic governance in Nigeria include; institutional failures emanating from self-aggrandizement, certificate forgery, inflation of contract sum, bribery and abuse of procedure.
Hence, the study recommended the following; national reorientation and civility of attitude among the political class, making popular plight and expectation priority in legislative agenda and functional and robust oversight functioning by the various legislative committee in curtailing executive excesses and abuses.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page – – – – – – – – – – – i
Approval Page – – – – – – – – – ii
Dedication – – – – – – – – – – – iii
Acknowledgements – – – – – – – — – – iv
Table of Contents – – – – – – – – – – v
List of Tables – – – – – – – – – – vii
List of figures – – – – – — – – – – viii
Abstract – – – – – – – – – – ix
CHAPTER ONE: Introduction
1.1 Background of the study – – – – – – – – 1
1.2 Statement of the problem – – – – – – – – 3
1.3 Objectives of the study – – – – – – – – 5
1.4 Significance of the study – – – – – – – – 5
CHAPTER TWO: Literature Review
2.1 Literature Review – – – – – – – – – 7
CHAPTER THREE: Methodology
3.1 Theoretical Framework – – – – – – – – 37
3.2 Hypotheses – – – – – – – – – – 42
3.3 Research Design – – – – – – – – – 42
3.4 Method of Data Collection – – – – – – – – 44
3.5 Method of Data Analysis – – – – – – – – 45
3.6 Logical Data Framework – – – – – – – – 46
CHAPTER FOUR: PROCESS OF LEGISLATION AND THE FEASIBILITY OF DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE IN NIGERIA AND UNITED STATES
4.1 The United States Congress: The Structure, Process and Dynamics – – 47
4.2 The United States Congress and Feasibility of Democratic Governance – 60
4.3 The Nigeria’s National Assembly: The Structure, Process and Dynamics – 61
4.4 The Nigeria’s National Assembly and Feasibility of Democratic Governance – 69
CHAPTER FIVE: THE FACTORS MILITATING AGAINST DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE IN USA AND NIGERIA
5.1 The Limitations of the US Congress – – – – – – – 70
5.2 The Limitations of Nigeria’s National Assembly – – – – 71
5.3 The Similarities and Differences between the US Congress and Nigeria’s
National Assembly – – – – — – – – 78
CHAPTER SIX: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 Summary – – – – – – – – – – 81
6.2 Conclusion – – – – – – – – – 81
6.3 Recommendations – – – – – – – – 81
Bibliography – – – – – – – – – 83
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the study
Democracy and governance are the bedrock of sustainable development of any country. Hence, the two terms are inexplicable but related with conceptual polemics.
However, scholars in spite of their diverse intellectual and ideological inclinations share the same views on its reflective attributes. On the history and concept of democracy, Madubuegwu, (2015) noted.
Democracy is a concept or historical antiquity. A popular and participatory system of mass driven government that enveloped and flourished in the vortex of Athenian imperelian and pericles (500-429 BC).
This classical democratic form of governance was exemplified in Athenian Ecclesia and Spartan Appella which underscored the relevance of political liberty and equality (2015:53).
Invariably, democracy is therefore seen as one of the ultimate ideas that modern civilization strive to create or preserve.
The word, “democracy” literally means “rule by the people” taken from Greek terms, demo (people) and Kratos (rule).
It is a political concept and form of government where a people are supposed to have equal voices in shaping policy (typically expressed through a vote for representatives) (Awah 2013:8).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aaron, W (1983). The politics of the budgetary process, 4th ed. (Boston: Little Brown)
Adekola, A. A. (2010). Democratic development in Nigeria since independence: Challenges and Africa in comparative perspective.Nothingham: Russell Press Ltd.
Ake, C (1994). Democratization and disempowerment. Lagos: Malthouse Press. Ake, C (1996). Democracy and development in Africa, Ibadan: Spectrum books. Almond, G, Bingham R, Russell J. and Strom (2011).Comparative politics. America: Stanford University Press.
Anifowose, R and Enemuo (1999).Elements of politics. Lagos, Nigeria: Sam Iroanusi Appadorai, A (1975).The substance of politics. London: Oxford University Press.